Colin, I'm using emacs-live: http://overtone.github.io/emacs-live/

To evaluate (+ 2 2) and spit the results I'm using C-u C-x C-e

It's definitely an evaluation, not a copy paste of the results.

Cheers, Jay

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Colin Yates <colin.ya...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jay - in your demo I can't determine whether the (+ 2 2) expression is
> evaluated and the results pasted inline or whether you have manually pasted
> them?
>
> I see you are using emacs, can you detail how you have configured emacs?
>
>
> On Tuesday, 4 February 2014 16:33:44 UTC, Jay Fields wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 8:17:44 AM UTC-5, Magomimmo wrote:
>>>
>>> thanks for the report.  I only have few doubts about REPL making TDD to
>>> shame.
>>
>>
>> In this blog entry -
>> http://blog.jayfields.com/2014/01/repl-driven-development.html - I
>> demonstrate (very briefly, by design) my workflow. I also give my thoughts
>> on TDD.
>>
>> On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 7:24:21 AM UTC-5, Rafael Peixoto de Azevedo
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 from Melbourne :)
>>
>>
>> I actually gave the talk in Melbourne, as part of YOW!. It was recorded
>> and will be online at some point.
>>
>> On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 7:22:06 AM UTC-5, Colin Yates wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there going to be online access during/after the event?  I would
>>> greatly value seeing this, but probably not enough to travel from the UK to
>>> Chicago :).
>>
>>
>> This talk will not be recorded (afaik), but it's the same as the YOW!
>> version, and that should be online soon.
>>
>> On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 8:02:28 AM UTC-5, ajlopez wrote:
>>>
>>> A question: did you abandon TDD? why?
>>> IMO, TDD is a workflow that pushes for simplicity
>>
>>
>> TDD, yes, for the most part. However, I still write a large number of
>> tests. YMMV though, as you may find that TDD gives you better design
>> direction. Assuming that's the case, I'd never try to convince you to do
>> something else. This is an experience report, not a prescription for
>> adopting Clojure. =)
>>
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojure/huwg05Vl2RY/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to