On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Atamert Ölçgen <mu...@muhuk.com> wrote:
> Why should it build a concrete result? > I realize the benefits of using LazySeq and do not have a strong opinion besides things gotta be consistent. Putting practical advantages and having a good default behaviour aside, I was wondering if there is a strong argument to use one vs another. set-s are indeed a sticky point here since the result of a map would different depending in the convention. So by that token there is something not abstracted well .... or I just do not understand map semantics well. This topic was in fact inspired by Scala implementation where map on Set returns Set (and so forth). Thx, A. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
