On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Travis Moy <moytra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Surprisingly it looks like (concat coll '(:a)) is faster than (conj coll-v > :a). That's not really what I would expect; does anybody have a good > explanation for this? Did I just bork the test somehow, or - I mean, > obviously concat's pretty fast but I was expecting conj to be on the level. > In fact, if you convert and then conj it's significantly slower than using > concat. > concat is lazy, so it's not really doing any work until you try to realize the sequence -- that's why it is so fast. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
