It is too late, but an enhancement jira would be appropriate. I would highly encourage some generative tests in such a patch and perhaps looking at https://github.com/ztellman/collection-check. With simple.check moving into contrib as test.check, we expect to be able to use test.check within Clojure tests soon as well.
On Monday, February 17, 2014 3:28:28 AM UTC-6, Jean Niklas L'orange wrote: > > > > On Sunday, February 16, 2014 11:49:38 AM UTC+1, Mikera wrote: >> >> Wow - that's a pretty big win. I think we should try and get this into >> Clojure ASAP. >> >> Are we too late for 1.6? >> > > Yeah, this is probably too late for 1.6 =/ > > Anyway, cool stuff you got going on here. I'm playing around with similar > functions myself (for a variant of RRB-Trees), but ended up with several > issues when I attempted to splice trees which shared structure. Is there > any indication that this will be an issue? An easy way to check this out is > to generate a large random map/set, then randomly generate maps/sets based > on the large one by cutting off random elements. Then you randomly splice > those maps/sets repeatedly, repeat the cutting, and continue with the > splicing. > > -- JN > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
