Thanks for the suggestion, but it doesn't work. With alternative 1, I still get the Unbound error, but I then get the same error with alternative 2. That is, they now both throw the same error.
Any other suggestions? On Monday, 7 April 2014 23:21:12 UTC+10, mlimotte wrote: > > To use alternative 1, you need ~lineseq in your eval: > > (eval `(def ~(symbol varname) ~lineseq)) > > > If you don't unquote lineseq like this, then you are def'ing "cards" to > the *symbol* lineseq. When you later access "cards", it is evaluated to > returns the symbol lineseq. But since lineseq was a local, it is no longer > in scope. What you actually wanted was to def "cards" to the value of > lineseq (which is what the unquote ~ does). > > marc > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Peter West <[email protected]<javascript:> > > wrote: > >> (eval `(def ~(symbol varname) lineseq)) >> >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
