>Judge Alsup did not conflate patent and copyright law. With regards to > asserting copyright in the Java API he concludes: ...[snip]...
Good point. I was wrong. The higher court ruled that Oracle DID have a copyright claim. I'm not a lawyer but I've read 3 books on intellectual property law. I've also spent many hours in discussions on copyright, patent, and trademark issues. I admit that most court decisions still baffle me. Tim Daly -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
