I think this approach should work. When I've specified hooks in this way, I've specified the function name as well... e.g.:
`:hooks [skeletor-clojure.hooks/add-revision-to-config.clj]` (don't let the `.clj` confuse you, the function name is _actually_ `add-revision-to-config.clj`). On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Phillip Lord <phillip.l...@newcastle.ac.uk> wrote: > > > I've been struggling with leiningen project hooks as I believe that I > need them for my current project. > > I am writing an manual with code examples, using a literate programming > technology. The main source is in asciidoc, but I can untangle these to > produce valid clojure, which I can then evaluate and test. > > To do this, however, I need to run an external process to generate the > "source" -- i.e. the Clojure files which are not really source in this > case, before I try to load them and test the functions in them. In > Maven, I can do this with the exec plugin by attaching to the initialize > phase. > > I thought to try leiningen hooks but as far as I can see this is only > possible within a plugin; so I have tried this... > > (defproject take-wing "0.1.0-SNAPSHOT" > :dependencies [[org.clojure/clojure "1.6.0"] > [uk.org.russet/tawny-owl "1.1.1-SNAPSHOT"]] > > :hooks [take.build.gensource] > ) > > > where "take.build.gensource" is defined in the src directory of the > project (most of the rest of this directory will be generated). > > Error: cannot resolve take.build.gensource/activate hook > Error: cannot resolve take.build.gensource/activate hook > > The take/build/gensource.clj file exists and it has an "activate" > function. > > I am guessing that this is failing because leiningen is not looking in > the project source-path, only it's own classpath. I'm a bit reticient to > write a leiningen plugin for this as a) it would be entirely specific to > this project and b) it would make the build more complex (AFAIK I'd have > to do a pre-build for the plugin, then another for the actual project) > and c) is a pain for anyone else. > > So, should hooks work under these circumstances? Or must I go the plugin > route? > > Phil > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
