FYI, using the :psuedo-names compiler option is very handy for debugging 
advanced-compile munging issues, e.g.:

     :compiler {:optimizations :advanced
                :pseudo-names true
                ...}



On Wednesday, July 30, 2014 10:11:17 AM UTC-5, Thomas Heller wrote:
> Geez, 2277 actually works just fine. 2234 doesn't work, but it actually 
> doesn't work with either closure-library version. Forgot that I reverted to 
> 2234 due to the keyword issue.
> 
> 
> 
> 2277 + [org.clojure/google-closure-library "0.0-20140718-946a7d39"]
> 
> 
> 
> seems fine, except for that keyword issue.
> 
> 
> 
> Sorry about the confusion, I will shut up now until I have something solid.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to