2014-08-05 19:04 GMT+02:00 Thomas Heller <th.hel...@gmail.com>: > If you don't need the result of the for loop (which you don't in your > example) use doseq. > > Same syntax as "for" but not lazy and no return value (well, nil to be > exact) >
I already use dotimes, or is doseq better? -- Cecil Westerhof -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
