I'm in agreement that Silk is a step in the right direction. I've reached out to Dom and I think we can learn a lot from each other and work together to improve the routing story in Clojure overall.
> There are some really good things in secretary. What do you think about them? > Splat, regex, format matchers. > protocol based render function for multiple arity "unmatching." this is > really great. These are definitely nice things and I'm willing to bet Silk would be capable of supporting some of them. It's obvious to me to that if we can iron out the details with Silk, Secretary could built on top of it as a higher level interface while at the same time taking advantage of what Silk has to offer. It might mean some breaking changes in Secretary but those were already slated anyway. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
