On 12 August 2014 at 13:49:42, Linus Ericsson (oscarlinuserics...@gmail.com) wrote:
The conclusion of this is I think the easiest way to make this work is to just run the algorithm in both versions and watch the object allocation statistics closely in VisualVM or similar. Yeah, that's exactly what I was hoping I might be able to avoid. Ah well. My intuition is that the there will be a lot of copied arrays Indeed. But intuition often isn't a good guide when it comes to optimisation (hence my wish to measure and make decisions based on data instead of intuition). -- paul.butcher->msgCount++ Silverstone, Brands Hatch, Donington Park... Who says I have a one track mind? http://www.paulbutcher.com/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/paulbutcher Skype: paulrabutcher Author of Seven Concurrency Models in Seven Weeks: When Threads Unravel http://pragprog.com/book/pb7con -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
