2014-09-17 11:51 GMT+02:00 Phillip Lord <phillip.l...@newcastle.ac.uk>:
> > So, why not special case 1 arg as well, and have that except? It's a > reasonable question. I would submit a bug report and see if anyone else > agrees. Something is wrong for sure. Either (> x) should throw arity, or > (>) should return true, or the docstring should be changed to note the > special case for (>). > > Totally agree, please post ticket number, so that we can favorite! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
