> On Sep 21, 2014, at 12:31 PM, Robert Tweed <fistful.of.spann...@gmail.com> > wrote:
> The whole (ns) block is just boilerplate that you ignore until you need to > refer back to look something up, which is the only time it makes any > difference. You can't ignore the boilerplate while you're writing it, which is a pain that I'd often prefer to avoid. You provide good reasons for preferring the approach that you advocate in the contexts in which you write programs. But people write code for lots of reasons in lots of contexts, and in some of them the minimization of boilerplate and ceremony is quite valuable. And in some of them the clarity provided by namespace qualification is not worth the extra typing and clutter. YMMV, which is really my main point. -Lee -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
