Oh thank goodness, I've been directing people towards the source for 
test.check, which is obviously sub-optimal. Thanks for adding that!

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Reid Draper <reiddra...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hey Andy,
> I've added a link to the API documentation [1]. And I'll update Codox for 
> the next version of test.check, hopefully to be released shortly.
> [1] 
> https://github.com/clojure/test.check/commit/200b77bbf24b67d2904dab4d4f5722badbe8b223
> Reid
> On Thursday, October 23, 2014 11:44:54 PM UTC-5, Andy Chambers wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday, October 23, 2014 11:21:44 PM UTC-4, Andy Chambers wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thursday, October 23, 2014 9:23:36 PM UTC-4, tcrayford wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Andy, All,
>>>>
>>>> I wrote a tool like this: https://github.com/tcrayford/laundromat
>>>>
>>>> it's super hacky, and the api is definitely in beta. I asked some folk 
>>>> about reviewing this api, got little feedback, and figured it wasn't that 
>>>> much of a wanted thing after all. I still use it internally, but it's 
>>>> pretty bad at what it does right now. I'd love to hear if more folk are 
>>>> interested or if anybody's interested in contributing.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Tom,
>>>
>>> Your project looks interesting and I definitely think it has value. Where 
>>> were you expecting feedback? When I have questions about a project like 
>>> this, I'm never sure where to ask them. Stackoverflow? A github issue? 
>>> Google groups? Anyway it looks pretty cool to my untrained eye but I'd be 
>>> interested in hearing what Reid Draper or Kyle Kingsbury has to say about 
>>> it.
>>>
>>> Do you mind me asking what made you decide to diverge from the original 
>>> Erlang implementation? Also what makes it bad? I'd be interested in helping 
>>> out if I can.
>>>
>>
>> Also, while I'm here talking about test.check, there's a couple of bugs 
>> I'd like to report.
>>
>>  * There's no link to the API docs in the README
>>  * I did manage to find some docs here (
>> http://clojure.github.io/test.check/) but there is no link to the source 
>> like there is in the compojure codox documentation
>>
>> I tried to use JIRA after signing the CA but the secure signing page 
>> doesn't seem to be working at the moment (screenshot attached).
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Andy
>>
>>>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to