I'd like to politely add to the calls for this to become a pluggable core.matrix backend.
On Tuesday, January 13, 2015 at 4:38:22 PM UTC-5, Dragan Djuric wrote: > > It would be nice if that would be that easy. However, I am sceptical... > > On Tuesday, January 13, 2015 at 8:13:36 PM UTC+1, Christopher Small wrote: >> >> Awesome project! >> >> I'll echo the encouragement towards having Neanderthal implement the >> core.matrix protocols. You'll have much higher adoption if folks know they >> can just plug your tool in by changing a single line setting the underlying >> implementation to Neanderthal. And as Mikera points out, it would be nice >> if we kept the Clojure matrix API space cohesive. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
