On 26/02/2015 09:59, Sébastien Orban wrote:
The way Clojure allow us to re use discrete component, rather than to
have them integrated from the get go(or getting integrated via various
hack), explain partially why there's no huge following to create a
framework of this kind. Luminus is a nice example - a start point to
understand this, as opinionated as Rails, but with more leeway to change
it's bit and piece. Don't forget Hoplon too, it bring us another
interesting viewpoint ! (And Boot. I love boot)
Clearly different than Rails or Play, but I'm happy about it -
otherwise, why wouldn't we use directly Rails ?
Do look at the Aaron Bedra video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBL59w7fXw4. He's the co-author or
"Programming Clojure" and in the video he points out some of the
advantages there are, particularly from a security point of view, in
adopting a more integrated framework.
gvim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
