Thank you pointing this out. Is there a consensus as to what versioning scheme works best? Or is there no such beast? Peter Taoussanis has expressed some reservations regarding SemVer and is proposing a variation on it, which he calls BreakVer.
https://github.com/ptaoussanis/encore/blob/master/BREAK-VERSIONING.md I can vouch for the quality of Peter's libraries, so I am inclined to adopt his scheme. Any thoughts? On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 at 3:33:53 AM UTC+3, Michael Klishin wrote: > > On 24 May 2015 at 03:59:52, Daniel Szmulewicz (daniel.s...@gmail.com > <javascript:>) wrote: > > System 0.0.8 has just been released, but it is not the same anymore. > > Then perhaps it deserves at least a minor version bump. > > Non-standard, confusing version numbers is already a significant enough > problem > in the community, and if you are building a thing that glues everything > together, > using a sensible versioning scheme (something very close to SemVer) is a > must. > -- > @michaelklishin, github.com/michaelklishin > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
