Leon spot on, maybe ill get to implement such a thing :)

On Friday, May 29, 2015 at 2:44:04 AM UTC+3, ronen wrote:
>
> Gary your last comment hits what I look for exactly:
>
> "If you are looking for an encoding of clojure's syntax extensions into 
> pure edn reader tags (as my crystall ball tells me you might be), I haven't 
> encountered such a thing yet, even though it's conceivable."
>
> My use case is to pass functions in configuration files (thus effecting 
> behavior), sending functions over the wire or storing them is another use 
> case 
>
> Its not enough to include the body, but also include required namespaces, 
> params it expects etc..
>
> Thanks
>
> On Thursday, May 28, 2015 at 8:14:41 PM UTC+3, Gary Verhaegen wrote:
>>
>> Not very clear to me either, but, in the spirit of reducing the field of 
>> possible understandings of the question: are you aware of eval? If so, can 
>> you reframe your question around it, i.e. what is it missing for your 
>> use-case or haw it's not a good fit? (If you are not yet aware of eval, 
>> know that it is just as bad as read security-wise.)
>>
>> Or perhaps you already have a clear idea of what you would want to do 
>> with the data structures in your edn file, and you're actually asking about 
>> how to register your custom literal reader with the edn reader?
>>
>> On Thursday, 28 May 2015, Herwig Hochleitner <hhochl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> 2015-05-27 18:14 GMT+02:00 ronen <nark...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Ok ill expand the question a bit hoping to make it clearer :)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Still not clear to me, but I'll try to expand a bit in the hope of 
>>> showing what is unclear.
>>>
>>> Clojure EDN has support for literal tags 
>>>> <https://github.com/edn-format/edn#inst-rfc-3339-format> and the 
>>>> ability of extending it with custom ones (records for example 
>>>> https://github.com/miner/tagged). 
>>>>
>>>
>>> Right, so what additional functionality are you looking for then? 
>>> Clojure is basically EDN + a bit of additional syntax, like anonymous fns 
>>> #(), vars #', deref @, syntax-quote ` ~ ~@, discarded expressions #_, read 
>>> eval #= and recently read cond #? I suppose you're not talking about that 
>>> additional syntax, because then it wouldn't be EDN anymore.
>>>
>>> I have a use case for storing functions in EDN and Iv found this 
>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FDatomic%2Fday-of-datomic%2Fblob%2Fmaster%2Fresources%2Fday-of-datomic%2Fclojure-data-functions.edn&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNHi_41fzdbV7ygT3-_g3oI4ZeJVJw>,
>>>>  
>>>> which seems to be an EDN form containing serialized Clojure functions for 
>>>> Datomic (which is closed source so I can't use its reader). 
>>>>
>>>
>>> As I implied above, Clojure code not utilizing any of the extra syntax 
>>> is perfectly readable by any EDN implementation. As far as datomic #db/fn 
>>> is concerned: If you pass clojure code in a string, I'm pretty sure it uses 
>>> clojure.core/read to read it. If you pass forms, as in the example you 
>>> posted, I guess it just uses those forms as they were and they will already 
>>> have been preprocessed by the reader before being passed to the reader 
>>> function of #db/fn, so again, clojure.core/read (normally).
>>>
>>> My question is if there is any open source implementation, I can't seem 
>>>> to find one.
>>>>
>>>
>>> There are many readers capable of reading EDN (clojure.tools.reader, 
>>> edn-java, haskell's edn, clojure.core/read, cljs reader, ...) some of those 
>>> will also be able to read the extensions that make clojure syntax.
>>>
>>> If you are looking for an encoding of clojure's syntax extensions into 
>>> pure edn reader tags (as my crystall ball tells me you might be), I haven't 
>>> encountered such a thing yet, even though it's conceivable.
>>>
>>> kind regards
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>>> your first post.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to