I bumped up the priority on CLJ-1224 to make sure it got pulled into 1.8 (based on being reminded about it here). I don't expect it to be included in 1.7.
On Thursday, June 11, 2015 at 9:30:21 PM UTC-5, Mike Rodriguez wrote: > > I agree the hashCode performance for records is a concern due to that lack > of caching. > > I noticed the priority of that Jira 1224 changed to "critical" about a > week ago (June 3). I was curious why that was done and what that means in > terms of prioritization. > > Last minute squeeze into CLJ version 1.7 release?! :) > > Too hopefully I'm sure. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
