My understanding was that if I pass an eduction to a process using reduce, I can save the computer time and space because the per step overhead of lazy sequences is gone and also the entire sequence does not have to reside in memory at once.
When I time the difference between (apply max (map inc (range 100000))) and (apply max (eduction (map inc) (range 100000))), the lazy-seq variant wins. I'd like to understand why, and when eductions should be used instead. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
