On 31 July 2015 at 17:18, Marcin Jurczuk <mjurc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Some reading is required to understand your code (never used volatile!) > but thanks for direction. > I will try this way. >
Volatiles were introduced in Clojure 1.7.0, and trade thread-safety for better performance. I could have used an atom for the cache, but because I'm locking the function to a single thread anyway, I didn't need the atomicity. - James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
