2015-08-13 10:08 GMT+02:00 Eric Le Goff <eleg...@gmail.com>: > I would be curious to know if there are difference (in terms of > performance / elegance ) between those 2 ways of expressing functions > > E.g > > *(fn [& x] (-> x sort last))* > > versus > > *#(last (sort %&))* > > Both are supposedly equivalent, but would you recommend one preferred > syntax , or this just a matter of personal style ? >
#() is for very short functions, mostly just one-liners, where the (fn []) would add significant noise. The line is blurry and a matter of taste; upper limit is when you need a nested fn, since #(#()) is not possible. Performance is equivalent, since #() desugars into (fn [..]). 2015-08-13 10:14 GMT+02:00 Erik Assum <e...@assum.net>: > (comp last sort) > That's not the same function as #(last (sort %&)) The equivalent would be (comp last sort vec) cheers -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
