On Tuesday, August 25, 2015 at 8:25:12 AM UTC-4, Alex Miller wrote: > > Fluid, I agree with Daniel that calling something "junk" is unnecessary, > especially when the people making and using such a tool are on the list. We > would like this to be a thoughtful, encouraging forum for discussion. > > Alex >
I seem to recall criticizing a piece of Clojure-relevant *technology* that had the rather remarkable property that it could be working, be deleted and reinstalled (exact same version), and suddenly be *not* working. Daniel, on the other hand, criticized a *person* and moreover his post had nothing whatsoever to do with Clojure. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
