Alex Miller <a...@puredanger.com> writes: > I'm trying to say - Clojure does not and will not support this on records > (for good reasons) and deftype is the tool to use if you want custom > equality semantics.
I understand, that's fine. Now, my original post asked about programmers' ability to replicate defrecord's functionality without compromising forward compatibility - defrecord implements a bunch of interfaces that are, AFAICS, undocumented. Will these remain sufficiently stable? -- Regards, Mike -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
