I created this ticket: http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1832
I don't know what will become of it, e.g. perhaps a change in behavior to the unchecked functions, perhaps a clarification to the documentation, perhaps nothing. I wouldn't be surprised if the Clojure core team judged the existing documentation strings to be explicit enough because they use little-L 'long', and it doesn't promise any behavior of any kind for arguments that are not 'long'. Feel free to add comments or edit the description if I've left anything out, vote on it, etc. Andy On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Gary Fredericks <fredericksg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Half of the time that I use the unchecked functions it's for the math, not > the speed, so getting the wrong behavior when I don't care enough about > perf to do the work for primitives is pretty annoying. > > > On Sunday, October 25, 2015 at 7:49:47 PM UTC-5, Gary Fredericks wrote: >> >> Maybe even not warn unless that one var where you can get >> boxed-math-warnings is set appropriately. >> >> On Sunday, October 25, 2015 at 2:04:36 PM UTC-5, Fluid Dynamics wrote: >>> >>> On Saturday, October 24, 2015 at 8:01:05 PM UTC-4, Gary Fredericks wrote: >>>> >>>> I've always thought this is bad behavior, since it's blatantly doing >>>> the opposite of what the name advertises. I think either the boxed versions >>>> should return the same result as the unboxed version, or (if the whole >>>> point is to give good performance and so we don't want want users to be >>>> able to accidentally use the unboxed versions) it should throw at >>>> compile-time for boxed args. >>>> >>> >>> Or it could emit just a warning at compile-time, and give the same >>> result at run-time as the unboxed version. Then you don't have to stop >>> everything else you're doing and fix the boxed math first, when you might >>> have higher priorities. The warnings will remind you to fix it eventually. >>> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
