If you're into editors or tooling we're happy to have help with LightTable 
- 
https://github.com/LightTable/LightTable/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#contributing
 
:)

Cheers,
Gabriel

On Friday, February 5, 2016 at 5:26:12 AM UTC-5, Mikera wrote:
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> My view is that the following things should be in core.matrix
> - Fundamental dataset and array programming operations (slicing, access, 
> reshaping, dimension labelling etc.)
> - Basic numerical operations (add, matrix multiply etc.)
> - Matrix operations that may have different underlying implementations 
> (SVD etc.)
> - Protocol based support for standard implementations (Java arrays, 
> Clojure vectors etc.)
>
> The following belong in other libraries:
> - More sophisticated algorithms building on the fundamental operations 
> (statistical techniques, machine learning etc.)
> - Anything to do with user interaction (graphing, GUIs etc.)
> - Tools for IO / data access etc.
>
> This is just a guideline though - happy to consider any specific function 
> on a case by case base. Probably best done via issues, so please file if 
> you have any!
>
> On Friday, 5 February 2016 03:27:47 UTC+8, Bruce Durling wrote:
>>
>> Mike, 
>>
>> I've had some of my team start using incanter 1.9.0. We've found and 
>> reported some issues and would like to contribute. Is there a good 
>> road map somewhere of what functions should stay in incanter and what 
>> ones should live in clojure.core.matrix.dataset? I'd like to know that 
>> any fixes we pursue would move towards the future design of incanter. 
>>
>> cheers, 
>> Bruce 
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Mikera <mike.r.an...@gmail.com> wrote: 
>> > There is the start of a dataframe-like implementation in 
>> > clojure.core.matrix.dataset 
>> > 
>> > Contributions in this area (or even just vigorous testing / issue 
>> reporting) 
>> > would be very welcome! 
>> > 
>> > On Tuesday, 2 February 2016 17:44:51 UTC+8, Gregg Reynolds wrote: 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Mikera <mike.r.an...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote: 
>> >>> 
>> >>> If you are interested in data science, help with core.matrix and the 
>> >>> associated libraries is always appreciated, and we are very 
>> >>> contributor-friendly in the numerical Clojure community. 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> Speaking of which,  the topic of Clojure came up on the Julia mailing 
>> list 
>> >> recently.  One comment was "I suspect the biggest issue is the lack of 
>> a 
>> >> good dataframes library for Clojure,..."  So something along that line 
>> would 
>> >> be a good project. 
>> > 
>> > -- 
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> Groups 
>> > "London Clojurians" group. 
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>> an 
>> > email to london-clojuri...@googlegroups.com. 
>> > To post to this group, send email to london-c...@googlegroups.com. 
>> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/london-clojurians. 
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to