I've tried core.typed a few times, but I always find it too difficult to work with.
On Thursday, 12 May 2016 15:05:50 UTC-7, raould wrote: > > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Nicola Mometto <brob...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > > Static types wouln't have helped at all in this case. Types are about > correctness, not performances. This comment was needless > > Here I thought maybe knowing when something was or was not something > could have been useful in, you know, making the code (benchmarks in > this case) actually do what the author wanted it to be doing. Silly > me. > > I will always have my fingers crossed for core.typed. :-) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
