I fear you’re missing my point.
You can get close to the previous nice value with: (#’s/explain-out (:result (t/check-var #’ranged-rand))) But that leverages a private function / implementation detail and doesn’t handle :failed-on very nicely: boot.user=> (#'s/explain-out (:result (t/check-var #'ranged-rand))) val: {:args {:start -3, :end 1}, :ret -5} fails predicate: (>= (:ret %) (-> % :args :start)) :failed-on :fn When you run-all-tests you get the non-pretty-printed version as a hard-to-read blob of text on stdout and a bare pass/fail map result. Having that text formatted via something like explain-out would be a big help for usability when testing. Having that function exposed publicly would be a nice convenience for other tooling to build on top of clojure.spec.test. We can pass :reporter-fn to check-var / check-fn, but we run-all-tests just passes println in and calls (prn ret) on the result of check-var so we have no control over that output. Sean Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood On 6/16/16, 6:33 AM, "Alex Miller" <clojure@googlegroups.com on behalf of a...@puredanger.com> wrote: You haven't pretty-printed it to look very nice, but I think all of the same information (and more due to shrinking) is still in the check-var output. I don't know of any plan to add what you're asking for beyond what's below. {:result {:clojure.spec/problems {[] {:pred (>= (:ret %) (-> % :args :start)), :val {:args {:start -1, :end 2}, :ret -2}, :via [], :in []}}, :failed-on :fn}, :seed 1466016600676, :failing-size 4, :num-tests 5, :fail [(-1 2)], :shrunk {:total-nodes-visited 5, :depth 1, :result {:clojure.spec/problems {[] {:pred (>= (:ret %) (-> % :args :start)), :val {:args {:start -1, :end 1}, :ret -2}, :via [], :in []}}, :failed-on :fn}, :smallest [(-1 1)]}} On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 at 2:54:27 PM UTC-5, Sean Corfield wrote: Given that we now have to use clojure.spec.test to get :ret / :fn tested, we lose the “nice” exceptions explaining the conformance failure: Alpha 5: ;;=> ExceptionInfo Call to #'spec-example.core/ranged-rand did not conform to spec: ;;=> At: [:fn] val: {:args {:start 8, :end 10}, :ret 7} fails predicate: (>= (:ret %) (-> % :args :start)) ;;=> :clojure.spec/args (8 10) ;;=> clojure.core/ex-info (core.clj:4617) Alpha 6: boot.user=> (t/check-var #'ranged-rand) {:result {:clojure.spec/problems {[] {:pred (>= (:ret %) (-> % :args :start)), :val {:args {:start -1, :end 2}, :ret -2}, :via [], :in []}}, :failed-on :fn}, :seed 1466016600676, :failing-size 4, :num-tests 5, :fail [(-1 2)], :shrunk {:total-nodes-visited 5, :depth 1, :result {:clojure.spec/problems {[] {:pred (>= (:ret %) (-> % :args :start)), :val {:args {:start -1, :end 1}, :ret -2}, :via [], :in []}}, :failed-on :fn}, :smallest [(-1 1)]}} Are there plans to provide an “explain” equivalent for this? Sean Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.