Give it a spin. It's very much early days so I wouldn't get too tied to anything that's currently present. It'll probably take a few months to get something closer to a real API nailed down but the conceptual foundation is there.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Luke Morton <[email protected]>wrote: > Excellent and insightful post David. Thanks for much for your work in > Clojure and ClojureScript. Going to be playing with Om as part of my > exploration of Clojure(Script). > > > On 19 December 2013 21:36, David Nolen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Thomas Heller <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hey David, >>> >>> looks really interesting although I have to be a little critical of your >>> benchmarks. Add a download of 200 todos via xhr and then do the render, you >>> will most certainly lose to other JS Framework out there (especially if you >>> choose EDN over JSON) cause of the extra overhead associated with going >>> from mutable->persistent. >>> >> >> Absolutely not. The benchmarks include serialization to localStorage, it >> doesn't add significantly to the time. Deserializing EDN would be >> completely dwarfed by network transport and DOM changes. >> >> Of course, the CLJS reader needs some work, but I think with further >> tuning, it will be highly unlikely to be the bottleneck. >> >> >>> I quite like react/om and will certainly play with it although I have >>> some worries concerning deeply nested data, since Clojure isn't exactly >>> performant in that situation. Happy to be proven wrong though. >>> >>> Anyways, nice work. Curious to see/hear more. >>> >> >> I ran some simple nested data benchmarks - all the time is spent ... in >> React. >> >> I think if people think a bit more about how Om works, you will see that >> it's an optimal design and highly unlikely for traditional approaches to be >> able to compete. >> >> David >> >> -- >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >> your first post. >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "ClojureScript" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. >> > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
