On 20 Dec 2013, at 18:07, Tim Visher <[email protected]> wrote: >> Is anyone aware of any specific reason(s) why symlinking om is a bad move? > > Transitive dependencies?
Ah, excellent point, although Om currently only depends on cljs and clj. Sam --- http://sam.aaron.name -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
