Currently React is included, this is likely to change and I will put React into it's own jar.
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Samuel Aaron <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 20 Dec 2013, at 18:07, Tim Visher <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Is anyone aware of any specific reason(s) why symlinking om is a bad > move? > > > > Transitive dependencies? > > Ah, excellent point, although Om currently only depends on cljs and clj. > > Sam > > --- > http://sam.aaron.name > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
