On Jan 9, 2014, at 8:29 PM, Laurent PETIT <[email protected]> wrote:

> Well, there are 2 sides to this "problem": 
> 
> - I am not a big fan of doing this, because it is more complex than it needs. 
> I have to think twice: "was there a special reason to nest one source-path 
> inside another?"

the reason was that those are the tools used as resources during development 
(something sometimes I do with the dev DB connection). As I said, I can move 
them directly in the main directory of the project. I did not do that because I 
did not want to dirt the stadnard project directory layout of any lein project. 

> - Java allows this, and so does Leiningen, so examples like that will pop 
> again. Some will be solved if people can join the authors and they agree to 
> change things (as you kindly suggested). Sometimes it will not be possible. 
> So, as a tools author, I will have to support this, I fear :-).

sorry about that….

> 
> For your particular starter, I can try to do the tests locally, to see if 
> there are other problems waiting for me around the corner, and once 
> everything is okay, I'll report here with all the changes I had to make.

Ok. Thanks so much

mimmo
> 
> -- 
> Laurent
>  
> 
> Mimmo
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 2014/1/9 Laurent PETIT <[email protected]>
>> Argh, Mimmo, I cannot make your example work: Eclipse doesn't like the fact 
>> that dev-resources/ is a source-path, while at the same time, 
>> dev-resources/tools/repl/ and dev-resources/tools/http/ are also 
>> source-paths (they are sub-folders of dev-resources/).
>> 
>> Is there an easy way around this?
>> 
>> 
>> 2014/1/9 Laurent PETIT <[email protected]>
>> Thanks, I will give it a try !
>> 
>> 
>> 2014/1/9 Mimmo Cosenza <[email protected]>
>> On Jan 9, 2014, at 6:25 PM, Mimmo Cosenza <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> I intended
>> 
>> …start evaluating in the repl
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> start evaluating cljs code in the repo
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jan 9, 2014, at 6:02 PM, Laurent PETIT <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hello, 
>>>> 
>>>> The current stable ( 0.20.0 ) version of CCW uses nrepl 0.2.1.
>>>> 
>>>> I've just updated it to 0.2.3 in the release that is coming out today. 
>>>> Maybe that can help?
>>>> 
>>>> I'd like to help you, but not doing any ClojureScript development atm, I 
>>>> need some guidance to be able to quickly setup something to test without 
>>>> having to dig through tons of docs.
>>>> 
>>>> If you can help me get started (the Austin README is real huge, what 
>>>> portion of it are you referring to? What assumed knowledge should I gather 
>>>> first?, etc.)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 2014/1/9 Frank Gerhardt <[email protected]>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I can run the Austin example fine from a shell. When running it from
>>>> Eclipse/CCW I can do everything except the last step, turning the repl
>>>> into a cljs-repl.
>>>> 
>>>> This (cemerick.austin.repls/cljs-repl repl-env) gives me
>>>> IllegalStateException Can't change/establish root binding of:
>>>> *cljs-repl-options* with set  clojure.lang.Var.set (Var.java:233)
>>>> 
>>>> From a shell exactly the same code as cloned from github works.
>>>> 
>>>> I noticed that the CCW REPL and the Eclipse Console are both getting
>>>> some output.
>>>> 
>>>> This is in the Eclipse Console:
>>>> 2014-01-09 17:03:28.511:INFO:oejs.Server:jetty-7.6.8.v20121106
>>>> 2014-01-09 17:03:28.556:INFO:oejs.AbstractConnector:Started
>>>> [email protected]:8090
>>>> Browser-REPL ready @ http://localhost:37583/4/repl/start
>>>> 
>>>> And in the CCW REPL I have the usual output like:
>>>> Browser-REPL ready @ http://localhost:37583/4/repl/start
>>>> 
>>>> I even saw the cljs-repl prompt in the Eclipse Console.
>>>> 
>>>> Has anbody go this working in Eclipse?
>>>> 
>>>> Frank
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>>>> your first post.
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "ClojureScript" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>>> email to [email protected].
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>>>> your first post.
>>>> --- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "ClojureScript" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>>> email to [email protected].
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
>> first post.
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "ClojureScript" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "ClojureScript" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to