FYI, I used om-sync on a weekend project and it worked great, didn't run into 
any bugs.

On Saturday, February 15, 2014 7:37:27 PM UTC-6, David Nolen wrote:
> I think Om actually presents a better modularity story, React is a bit more 
> of a free for all with respect to how you design components.
> 
> 
> om-sync is close to what you describe - we'll get there.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> David
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Conrad Barski <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Thursday, February 13, 2014 8:55:00 PM UTC-6, David Nolen wrote:
> 
> > I've been banging the drum about Om & modularity for a while now and I've 
> > come up with the very beginning of a simple reusable component that I think 
> > demonstrates the power of Om's emphasis on modularity and application wide 
> > state management:
> 
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > http://github.com/swannodette/om-sync
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > The whole point of Om is to create a universe of shareable components. I 
> > hope this gets people thinking about the possibilities.
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > Feedback welcome!
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > David
> 
> 
> 
> I agree that creating an ecosystem of components is where the future is... 
> I'm surprised that there isn't a "ReactjsUI" library yet.
> 
> 
> 
> Stop me if this is obvious, but it seems like the natural conclusion of Om is 
> to have an Om-server library as well to build html server-side, and then have 
> an Om-bridge component or something that automagically bridges between client 
> and server. Then, when a client-side component updates any state that 
> originates in the server part, the existing Om interfaces probably are 
> already comprehensive enough that the Om-bridge component could just 
> transparently use AJAX to push those updates into the state of the Om 
> components residing on the server.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> 
> ---
> 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "ClojureScript" group.
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> 
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> 
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.

-- 
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ClojureScript" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.

Reply via email to