Awesome :)
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Conrad Barski <[email protected]> wrote: > FYI, I used om-sync on a weekend project and it worked great, didn't run > into any bugs. > > On Saturday, February 15, 2014 7:37:27 PM UTC-6, David Nolen wrote: > > I think Om actually presents a better modularity story, React is a bit > more of a free for all with respect to how you design components. > > > > > > om-sync is close to what you describe - we'll get there. > > > > > > > > > > David > > > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Conrad Barski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thursday, February 13, 2014 8:55:00 PM UTC-6, David Nolen wrote: > > > > > I've been banging the drum about Om & modularity for a while now and > I've come up with the very beginning of a simple reusable component that I > think demonstrates the power of Om's emphasis on modularity and application > wide state management: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://github.com/swannodette/om-sync > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The whole point of Om is to create a universe of shareable components. > I hope this gets people thinking about the possibilities. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Feedback welcome! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > David > > > > > > > > I agree that creating an ecosystem of components is where the future > is... I'm surprised that there isn't a "ReactjsUI" library yet. > > > > > > > > Stop me if this is obvious, but it seems like the natural conclusion of > Om is to have an Om-server library as well to build html server-side, and > then have an Om-bridge component or something that automagically bridges > between client and server. Then, when a client-side component updates any > state that originates in the server part, the existing Om interfaces > probably are already comprehensive enough that the Om-bridge component > could just transparently use AJAX to push those updates into the state of > the Om components residing on the server. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > > > > --- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "ClojureScript" group. > > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to [email protected]. > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
