On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Sean Corfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> In the case of application state being modified "externally", would you > recommend having an invisible Om component listen for those changes and > apply them through transact! itself? Or is the approach of just swapping in > a delta considered fully supported and "recommended"? > > (given the discussions I've been having with you on IRC and from my only > playing with Om, I'd lean toward the former, but the latter is certainly > "simpler") > > Sean > "Invisible" components in Om are fully supported. This is precisely the idea behind om-sync, a reusable synchronization controller component which has no visual representation. I recommend the former approach. Using swap! is not something I recommend at all. David -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
