On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Dave Della Costa <[email protected]>wrote:
> I see...I think this wasn't clear to me in our earlier back-and-forth in > this thread. If it is best practice to create a utility/invisible > component which receives input from the server--something analogous to > om-sync, but the reverse I guess--then I'd rather go with that. > > I guess the advantages in general for doing all your data manipulation > inside of Om are that updates can be picked up and used for rendering > optimizations, per your earlier comment, correct? Yes. To be clear Om will likely always support swap! usage as best it can as it's hard to predict precisely what time management facilities any particular application will need. That said, in my opinion, there is no reason to reach to for swap! at this time if you are not doing custom time management. David -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
