I believe the downside of the :shared option is that it does not participate in
'should component update' and I don't think there was ever an implementation of
the shared-cursor idea I saw above.
On Thursday, September 18, 2014 10:12:48 PM UTC-7, jack james wrote:
> On Saturday, September 13, 2014 8:58:38 AM UTC-5, Brian Gaines wrote:
> > I have noticed you have posted updates since this thread died, but I didn't
> > see the feature added. Are you still working on it, or is there another
> > method preferred for handling this issue, or have I overlooked it in one I
> > the updates?
> >
> > Thank you for your time.
>
> I'm also uncertain as to the status of the changes that were discussed in
> this thread. I'm also not able to find the "nested tab view" example. Does
> that exist anywhere? Has there been a substantial change since April as it
> pertains to this notion of "independent components"?
>
> I've experimented with ...{:shared {:app-state @app-state}}..., and in that
> way I can pull data from app-state into components with (om/get-shared owner
> [:app-state :foo]). But what I need (I think...) is to get a cursor from
> app-state, without passing it through all of the parent components, that i
> can use with update! & transact!. Not possible?
--
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ClojureScript" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
