There are still changes that need to propagate to Piggieback. And regardless of Piggieback, currently a lot of REPLs unnecessarily do things in slightly different ways (some of these, but not all, attributable to the fact that previously Piggieback could *not* reuse the existing REPL loop and had to copy pasta loop logic, with the obvious problem that it's out of sync now). Other problems have to do with previously undefined contracts, like any failure in REPL setup should fail the REPL.
All this to say - I would wait a bit. The foundation is better but there is still some catch up to do. David On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Tristan Strange <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > In light of the recent REPL fixes what's the simplest means of configuring > a project that allows me to both: > > - Evaluate expressions from Vim to a browser based REPL > - Have figwheel style reloading files. > > Should I look to Weasel to provide the REPL and disable's figwheel's built > in one? > > Are either needed at all now the problem's with ClojureScript's own REPL's > have been 'fixed'? > > Many thanks, > Tristan > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
