Google trends begs to differ: https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=clojure%2C%20clojurescript&cmpt=q&tz=
I'll reply again later when I've had time to calculate some numbers, but my usage stats for Cursive pretty clearly show that CLJS is used much, much less than Clojure. I was surprised by this because there seems to be a similar level of traffic on the two mailing lists and ClojureScript has had a lot of great work done on it recently, and I had put it down to the fact that Cursive didn't have a very good CLJS REPL story. Perhaps that wasn't the reason after all. On 24 April 2015 at 17:39, Daniel Compton <[email protected]> wrote: > The most recent Clojure survey has 1300 people using Clojure, and 740 > using ClojureScript (people could choose both if desired, and 98% of > respondents used Clojure). Assuming even sampling across both communities > (unlikely given the self responding nature of the survey) roughly half of > the Clojure community also uses ClojureScript to some extent. > > https://cognitect.wufoo.com/reports/state-of-clojurescript-2014-results/ > https://cognitect.wufoo.com/reports/state-of-clojure-2014-results/ > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:17 PM Mike Thompson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> I'm curious about the approximate size of the clojurescript community, >> and its current trajectory numerically speaking. >> >> So, absolute numbers like: how many active cljs programmers are there? >> And/or relative numbers like: growing at X%. >> >> I'm wondering where useful numbers might live. >> >> Obviously there is google trends for relative numbers: >> https://www.google.com.au/trends/explore#q=cljs >> https://www.google.com.au/trends/explore#q=clojurescript >> >> >> I've also found one interesting absolute number via: >> https://clojars.org/lein-cljsbuild/versions/1.0.5 >> >> There have been 5258 downloads of cljsbuild. This is a relatively recent >> release (8 weeks ago) so most will have moved across to use it, and there >> might not be too much duplication in that number because few will have >> changed machines in that time or deleted their .m2 and re-downloaded. Maybe. >> >> Of course, this number ignores boot. And there will still be some on >> 1.0.4. Etc. >> >> Other thoughts? >> >> >> -- >> Mike >> >> >> -- >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >> your first post. >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "ClojureScript" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. >> > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
