Why *does* Transit have another UUID type? I was surprised to see that.
> On Sep 26, 2015, at 6:06 PM, Nikita Prokopov <[email protected]> wrote: > > Having two UUID types around is not a good idea. Transit shouldn’t have its > own type, but since it’s there, I recommend re-configure transit reader to > always read native CLJS UUIDs: > > (defn read-transit-str [s] > (t/read (t/reader :json { :handlers {"u" cljs.core/uuid} }) s)) > > You‘ll save yourself A LOT of headache, trust me > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
