Yeah, I wondered that too. Given that cljs.core/uuid was already established…
I am sure (and hope!) there is a good technical reason. > On 27 Sep 2015, at 12:13 AM, Jamie Orchard-Hays <[email protected]> wrote: > > Why *does* Transit have another UUID type? I was surprised to see that. > > >> On Sep 26, 2015, at 6:06 PM, Nikita Prokopov <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Having two UUID types around is not a good idea. Transit shouldn’t have its >> own type, but since it’s there, I recommend re-configure transit reader to >> always read native CLJS UUIDs: >> >> (defn read-transit-str [s] >> (t/read (t/reader :json { :handlers {"u" cljs.core/uuid} }) s)) >> >> You‘ll save yourself A LOT of headache, trust me >> >> -- >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your >> first post. >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "ClojureScript" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
