Ah, never mind. It's understandable that people don't have the time to test every idea out there and don't want to express an opinion until they have done so.
I was so sure that my idea had a big flaw I hadn't seen that I thought it would be pointed out by an experienced developer. Vianney On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 at 2:16:33 PM UTC+1, Zubair Quraishi wrote: > On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 at 11:13:25 AM UTC+1, Vianney Stroebel (vibl) > wrote: > > Ok, I guess this idea is so stupid nobody even bothers saying it is. :-) > > > > Vianney > > > > On Thursday, December 3, 2015 at 3:40:56 PM UTC+1, Vianney Stroebel (vibl) > > wrote: > > > I posted an idea for a reactive and faster alternative to Datascript: > > > > > > https://github.com/tonsky/datascript/issues/132 > > > > > > It seems too good to be true on paper so I probably have overlooked > > > things. > > > > > > Comments are welcome! > > > > > > Vianney > > A shame that noone replied. I have not used Datomic so can not comment on it -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
