I don’t think that logic holds. Maybe more specific questions would elicit more response?
I don’t have any ‘dog in the game’ here, and maybe it really is a stupid idea (I doubt it! though but haven’t formed an opinion yet!) but the lack of responses doesn’t imply that, merely the cost of people’s attention is quite expensive. Fight that discouragement :-). > On 8 Dec 2015, at 10:13, Vianney Stroebel (vibl) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ok, I guess this idea is so stupid nobody even bothers saying it is. :-) > > Vianney > > On Thursday, December 3, 2015 at 3:40:56 PM UTC+1, Vianney Stroebel (vibl) > wrote: >> I posted an idea for a reactive and faster alternative to Datascript: >> >> https://github.com/tonsky/datascript/issues/132 >> >> It seems too good to be true on paper so I probably have overlooked things. >> >> Comments are welcome! >> >> Vianney > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
