So, I'm having great fun playing with an in-house implementation of the GraphQL spec (extended to do more, and some custom-y things) and I wanted to share the rational for our adoption of GraphQL/Relay with the Clojure/Script in hope that I can see how it differs from Om.Next + Datomic (or whatever Om.Next uses on the backend) from enlightened folks
For me this kind of 'deep architecture' is unattainable via things like Reagent/Reframe and Om.Next is probably (I'm thinking out loud here) the closest option for those of us who like to stay within the Clojure/Script ecosystem. Please feel free to take this post apart https://gist.github.com/idibidiart/49a095b6bc528638f34f and let us know if we're missing anything. I focused on Redux + Reselect in my critique but the same applies to Reframe, which is what Redux/Reselect aims to mimic in the JS world. Also, for another perspective on this topic of comparing advances in JS to state of the art in ClojureScript, someone from the GraphQL team tweeted this last week, and so I feel obliged to include it, although I've yet to read it myself (life is short) http://hueypetersen.com/posts/2016/02/13/om-next-from-a-relay-graphql-perspective/ Cheers Marc -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
