Didn't take me long before I zoomed in on the dark side of GraphQL :) like a magnet
See under "Limitations" https://gist.github.com/idibidiart/49a095b6bc528638f34f Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 19, 2016, at 8:41 PM, Marc Fawzi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > So, I'm having great fun playing with an in-house implementation of the > GraphQL spec (extended to do more, and some custom-y things) and I wanted to > share the rational for our adoption of GraphQL/Relay with the Clojure/Script > in hope that I can see how it differs from Om.Next + Datomic (or whatever > Om.Next uses on the backend) from enlightened folks > > For me this kind of 'deep architecture' is unattainable via things like > Reagent/Reframe and Om.Next is probably (I'm thinking out loud here) the > closest option for those of us who like to stay within the Clojure/Script > ecosystem. > > Please feel free to take this post apart > > https://gist.github.com/idibidiart/49a095b6bc528638f34f > > and let us know if we're missing anything. > > I focused on Redux + Reselect in my critique but the same applies to Reframe, > which is what Redux/Reselect aims to mimic in the JS world. > > Also, for another perspective on this topic of comparing advances in JS to > state of the art in ClojureScript, someone from the GraphQL team tweeted this > last week, and so I feel obliged to include it, although I've yet to read it > myself (life is short) > > http://hueypetersen.com/posts/2016/02/13/om-next-from-a-relay-graphql-perspective/ > > Cheers > > Marc > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
