Both SATA Disks, the destination is a virtual machine but I did some IO-Performance tests with dd on the virtual machine. It is definitely able to write and read with more than 20MB/s. (I did dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/zero bs=100M count=10 etc.)
The network can't really limit the speed, so I don't know what is could be. What's your experience with the speed? Is it faster? I'll do some tests on my own with dd and netcat or so. ((sorry, forgot to click the reply-all button ;) )) On 29.03.2010 16:26, Steven Shiau wrote: > How about the speed when you save the image? > What's the disk types in the source and destination machines? SATA? > PATA? USB? Or? > > Steven. > > Lukas Grässlin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> whats's you experience with the onthefly migration (that partclone over >> netcat thing) especially perfomance? >> >> I never get more than ~300MB/min (=~ 5MB/s) in a Gigabit network which >> is very dissappoiting. I already tried it without compression etc but I >> didn't get more speed. (Further the machines are fast enough to do it >> faster than 5MB/s with compression). >> >> Is that a partclone issue? Have you any ideas? >> >> Regards, >> Lukas >> >> > -- Lukas Grässlin Collax GmbH . Basler Str. 115a . 79115 Freiburg . Germany p: +49 (0) 89-990 157-23 Collax - Simply Linux. Geschäftsführer: Boris Nalbach AG München HRB 158898 * Ust.-IdNr: DE 814464942 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Clonezilla-live mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live
