Is there a possibility of an Atomic Edition that doesn't shift the Cloud Edition focus away from being a good base? Atomic is a specialized case for general cloud workloads, and containerizing everything probably won't be a near time thing.
But then, I don't know what constitutes criteria for a top level edition vs a spin. -Matt M On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Adam Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Joe Brockmeier <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 03/10/2015 02:53 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> So, I'm wondering if for F22 (or F23, if we feel like that ship is out > >> in the harbor losing sight of land already), we want to do one of two > >> things: > >> > >> A. Move Atomic out of the Cloud Edition, and treat it as a spin, with a > >> home at "http://atomic.fedoraproject.org/"; (not currently valid), > >> similar to http://kde.fedoraproject.org — with its own design, > theming, > >> etc. > >> > >> Here, the Cloud WG / Cloud SIG would focus more on cloud/virt-guest > >> issues, and possible also cloud infrastructure (openstack, > >> eucalyptus, etc., which we have kind of let fall to the wayside). > >> The Cloud Base image would be the primary Fedora Edition, and Fedora > >> Atomic would be more ... stand-alone. > >> > >> B. The other way around: double down on Atomic as the primary thing the > >> Cloud WG releases as the Fedora cloud product. Here, the focus would > be > >> more on containers as the basis for the future of "cattle-style" > >> scale-out computing, and Atomic as Fedora's cool solution for that. > >> The Cloud Base image would be the one changed into a spin — after > >> all, going back to the Lego metaphor for the Fedora editions, the > >> products are supposed to be focused on "batteries included" > >> solutions, and while an awesome building block, the minimal base > >> doesn't quite do that. > >> > >> C. Nah, keep doing the two different things and present in parallel, as > >> we've been doing. > > > > Let's discuss this at this week's meeting? My gut is to pursue Atomic as > > a spin (A) rather than asking the Cloud WG to double-down on Atomic, but > > maybe the rest of the Working Group feels differently... > > > > FWIW +1 for Spin (A) > > -AdamM > > > Best, > > > > jzb > > -- > > Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst > > [email protected] | http://community.redhat.com/ > > Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cloud mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud > > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > > > _______________________________________________ > cloud mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct >
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
