On 03/10/2015 09:20 PM, Michael P. McGrath wrote:
>  Fedora in particular will have their
> rawhide and stable releases promoted differently on the Fedora sites and
> the project atomic page will likely promote things a little differently
> and that is probably Ok as long as everyone ultimately has a choice to
> download whatever they want.  I think the promotion part is largely just
> a way to direct people who otherwise don't know how to make an informed
> decision.

If we don't have a unified story between Project Atomic and Fedora w/r/t
what to download and what we think people "should" use, it's going to be
confusing. I'm very concerned that an Atomic that conforms to the normal
Fedora release cycle + a fast-moving Fedora-based Atomic from Project
Atomic is going to be a messaging nightmare.

Some people's entry point to the discussion is via Project Atomic, some
enter via Fedora - and then of course we get people coming from third
parties who are writing about Project Atomic for a variety of reasons
and with a varying level of understanding about what Atomic is. We've
seen people just assume "oh, there's a CentOS build that says Atomic, it
*must* be a rebuild of RHEL Atomic" (which is wrong) and come away
disappointed.

Assuming we'll be OK as "everyone has a choice to download what they
want" may be overly optimistic here.

The more I think about this, the more I think we really need a unified
story rather than having two separate entry paths to Atomic for Fedora.

> On the Project Atomic side I'm mostly concerned with the emerging tech.
> Getting new features in front of people as soon as possible.  In the
> short term, Fedora rawhide really is the only place to do that.  Longer term
> though there is a desire to base the Atomic dependent packages (docker,
> kubernetes, etcd, ostree, etc.) on something more stable.


-- 
Joe Brockmeier | Project Atomic Doer of Things
[email protected] | http://projectatomic.io
Twitter: @jzb  | http://dissociatedpress.net/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Reply via email to