On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Peter Robinson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Subhendu Ghosh <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Both networks and NM might be needed in the future. We should look into > how > > we can build images that support both or look to build alternate images. > > > > NM stack is useful for WiFi and cellular enabled images in IoT gateway > > devices. I don't really see networkd supporting the those requirements. > > I would expect an IoT image for a gateway device would need a bunch of > other things that wouldn't be relevant for a generic cloud image so > would it be better to target that as a separate image rather than > trying to jam everything into one? It would be easier to define and a > lot simpler in terms of QA and other moving parts. > > True - that's why I noted there may be use cases for both. And we should attempt to wire up the usability thru both stacks even if we end up building 2 different images. Also as Colin noted, Atomic host is likely to get used on both bare-metal and cloud - so giving networkd a full press effort for a release cycle might be good. In not like these decisions cannot be changed. -subhendu
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
