On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Peter Robinson <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Subhendu Ghosh <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Both networks and NM might be needed in the future. We should look into
> how
> > we can build images that support both or look to build alternate images.
> >
> > NM stack is useful for WiFi and cellular enabled images in IoT gateway
> > devices. I don't really see networkd supporting the those requirements.
>
> I would expect an IoT image for a gateway device would need a bunch of
> other things that wouldn't be relevant for a generic cloud image so
> would it be better to target that as a separate image rather than
> trying to jam everything into one? It would be easier to define and a
> lot simpler in terms of QA and other moving parts.
>
>
True - that's why I noted there may be use cases for both. And we should
attempt to wire up the usability thru both stacks even if we end up
building 2 different images.

Also as Colin noted, Atomic host is likely to get used on both bare-metal
and cloud  - so giving networkd a full press effort for a release cycle
might be good. In not like these decisions cannot be changed.

-subhendu
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]

Reply via email to