On 12/21/2015 04:05 PM, Subhendu Ghosh wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com > <mailto:pbrobin...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Subhendu Ghosh > <sghosh...@gmail.com <mailto:sghosh...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Both networks and NM might be needed in the future. We should > look into how > > we can build images that support both or look to build alternate > images. > > > > NM stack is useful for WiFi and cellular enabled images in IoT > gateway > > devices. I don't really see networkd supporting the those > requirements. > > I would expect an IoT image for a gateway device would need a bunch of > other things that wouldn't be relevant for a generic cloud image so > would it be better to target that as a separate image rather than > trying to jam everything into one? It would be easier to define and a > lot simpler in terms of QA and other moving parts. > > > True - that's why I noted there may be use cases for both. And we > should attempt to wire up the usability thru both stacks even if we > end up building 2 different images. > > Also as Colin noted, Atomic host is likely to get used on both > bare-metal and cloud - so giving networkd a full press effort for a > release cycle might be good. In not like these decisions cannot be > changed. > > -subhendu > > > > > _______________________________________________ > cloud mailing list > cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org I thought NM was starting to use networkd under the covers?
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
